Why is Meghan Markle such a CUNT?

I mean the bitch was white until about 5 minutes ago, she pretended to have no idea about who the royal family were and yet their is evidence she was very aware of them, she treated Charlotte like shit at her wedding along with her ex-bestie Jessica whatever the fuck her name is and she put pressure on a family when a senior member was at deaths door. So what happened during her upbringing that created such a mega CUNT?

Her daddy spoiled her and paid for everything up until her thirties. She lies about how rough her life was and how hard she had to work, but it is all bullshit.

Meghan is just a nasty, spiteful person.

I don't understand the hatred for her on here.

R3 she's a golddigging grifter. Since when has the DL supported golddigging grifters. Particularly when they're D list actresses.

Narcissistic personality disorder.

SS. why do you put up threads like this only to FF them to oblivion? Does Smegs need more victim material for her next whine-athon?

It's not even that she is a grifter it's that she is so bad at the grift. The choices she and Harry made were due to their hubris caused their current state. Neither one of them seem to understand what the public wants and then they cry when people see through their ruse.

On top of that, their lack of curiosity or depth is off putting. It is as if their only pursuit is fame (or, infamy). Think about what you would have done had you been in Meghan's position? I am a history buff so would have loved having private tours of the UK's castles and other historical places. Others would enjoy getting to meet interesting people never before within their reach. Others may have checked out all the great curry spots. Yet, she seemingly had no curiosity for any of it save for if she was trending on social media. Such a waste of an opportunity on a person who does not seem to have any interior life whatsoever.

Calling her a cunt is rather harsh. I think she’s a narcissist who knew what she was after from the get go, but surely that’s half of Hollywood?

The CUNT couldn't even leverage her connections to get a good disney job, that whoring Harry did on the red carpet only got her a voice over job on some documentary barely anyone watched!

Social climbers are always cunts. They are also liars, grifters and narcissists. They blame others, treat others like shit and play the victim to get what they want. Markle has all these despicable qualities and has little or no redeeming qualities. Markle is toxic and poisons everyone and everything around her.

Shall I continue?

[quote]I don't understand the hatred for her on here.

Starts with an "R"...

This is a Boris Thread. The racists hate Meghan.

Wonder why?

Why haven't we seen Lilibet yet? I'm beginning to wonder if the brat is as dark as Grandma Doria and they're really not sure how to handle it.

If you are going to grift do it like Yoko Ono. That talentless old cunt still has loads of cash and hobnobs with A-listers, even though she is utter trash.

She's such a tacky bitch. When Americans marry royalty (and we love royalty), a Princess Grace - a gorgeous, Oscar-winner - does us proud.

Markle's such a nonentity. I thought one of the cruelest things her enemies at the 'Firm' did to her was giving her the patronage of the Royal National Theatre. Imagine how snubbed she would be by RADA trained actors, veterans of the Royal Shakespeare Company when faced with a no-talent 'actress/model' from a trashy cable TV show. The sneering behind their hands....

Why would Harry have gone for it? Did she promise to give him extremely great blow jobs every night for the rest of his life?

R17) Harry got dumped by Chelsy, he got dumped by Cressida. Only an American 'actress' with no professional future and who had run out of potential rich husband material would have been interested.

R18 Right, attractive members of the royal family find it so hard to arouse interest in potential mates!

[quote]Why haven't we seen Lilibet yet?

R14. We haven't seen Lilibet yet because the Monteshitto duo are looking for other other avenues of cash. They are planning to sell the pictures to the highest bidder (think People Magazine, Vanity Fair, etc.), and then strike a deal for the copyright of those same picture in publications around the world.

Privacy, my arse. They want money.

Same R8. They're so bad at it. Becky Sharp she is not.

R18, I like your sarcasm, and agree with it. Harry is fairly good-looking, wealthy, impeccably connected and was massively popular with the UK public.

And yet he was still turned down by women who knew him very well, and had to get a social-climbing wife who lived so far away that their time together before their marriage was very limited. I wonder why that was.

Ah sorry, r22 was meant to be addressed to r19.

R22 Hung like a mosquito maybe?

Harry is not attractive - gingers rarely are. He has the face of a ferret. And a ferret's teeth.

R25 Oh tosh. He still has his looks, though they won't last. Look at William.

What I don't get is why people who seem to hate her like OP, keep promoting her. I wouldn't be starting threads about a celebrity that I didn't like. I find it amusing. Politicians you hate are different, they pass laws and taxes that affect everyone, If you chose so, nothing Meghan Markle can affect you.

What I don't understand about the whole Meghan Markle thing is whose idea was it in the first place. All royal marriages are arranged. I mean, Meghan is an attractive woman, and I can understand Harry's being a little horny for her, but a Windsor marrying a "person of color," even a very cafe au lait one like Meghan, was a huge deal. The idea must have originated with the political establishment and the courtiers, or maybe the courtiers opposed it and were overruled. Someone in power must have felt that it was vital to show the royal family moving ahead in the modern world.

R28 yeah - had she been a white golddigger and failed 'actress' - no way

We used to ask this about Julie.

Yoko Ono had an established career before meeting John Lennon. She also came from a wealthy family. Nothing like MM.

Because she's an Angry Black Woman.

Duh.

Any other questions?

Uptempo:

"The girl can't help it, the girl can't help it, the girl can't help it . . .:

[quote]Since when has the DL supported golddigging grifters.

You're not a Datalounger, you're just some interloping old woman who posts here because no one else lets you have your senior moments where you scream "Meghan Markle is a cunt" 3 times a day, just as your meds start to wear off.

R3 Well, you know she is trying to harm the family that got her where she is. Very publicly. She reeks of spite, petty but devouring jealousy, and hypocrisy.

She is really horribly unlikable, and as she keeps making a public spectacle of it, it's hardly surprising she'd end up on DL, a place nothing if not exceptionally attuned to shallow poseurs.

R28 I don't know what century you think this is, but all royal marriages are NOT arranged. Some may be undertaken under more practical than passionate outlooks, like Charles' to Diana (and we know how successfully practical THAT turned out!), but the Yorks, Wessexes, Pss. Anne's two marriages, and William's to Kate, were love matches.

The Queen herself had to wait years for her father's permission to marry the penniless Philip from a dodgy family. She fell in love with him at 13 and never considered marrying anyone else.

Where the fuck did you get an idea like that? Have looked at Crown Prince Haakon of Norway's wife?! Prince Carl Philip of Sweden's?!

The only time they're "arranged" is if the next man up to the throne is gay.

Other than that, them days is past.

Both Harry and Meghan are fug. They always have been. William was always the cute brother.

R38 - Yes, Harry drew the short straw, although he was hot for a few years in his twenties, before he got scraggly and solemn.

William was taller, bigger, looked like Harry's idolised Mum, was first and was getting all the goods and ever increasing status, didn't have Harry's mental issues, and Diana favoured William because she turned to him for the support and love she couldn't get from Charles.

Meghan was the woman who saw she could turn all that envy and rage to advantage. His previous girlfriends either didn't want him badly enough to use it, or weren't as skilled manipulators as Meghan.

So she got the brass matrimonial ring.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[quote]r17 Why would Harry have gone for it?

She obviously duped him.

Stop creating new threads when there are already several.

R35 I've been on the DL since Bill Clinton was being impeached. Go back to Lipstick Alley. You're out of your element on here.

No one was trying to interact with this Priyanka person. What a joke of a story.

[quote] All royal marriages are arranged.

No. Not any longer.

If that were still true, William would never have married the profoundly middle-class Kate Middleton. She's worked out happily for the royal family, but I am sure they would have preferred him to marry a girl from an aristocratic family. Same with Anne's marriages to Mark Phillips and Timothy Laurence.

R45 I think exactly the opposite is true where William and Kate were concerned. They WANTED a commoner for William. They constantly have an eye out for public opinion, and public opinion wanted less snootiness.

After Charles, Anne and Andrew's divorce + Diana's death, I think they were ready to let the "boys" choose their wife.

Of course, William's wife needed to be suitable for a Queen, but Kate proved herself at royalling.

Harry married a cunt but it doesn't matter. With time they gonna be more and more irrelevant.

You'd have to show me some sort of proof before I would believe that, r46.

The fact that William took years to marry Kate means he was hesitant or under the influence of the Royal family about marrying somebody who was neither royal nor aristocratic. I'm sure some suitable European princesses were paraded before him. And Princess Caroline - whose mother had tried desperately to hook her up with Prince Charles - made a stab at hooking up her daughter Charlotte with William.

They married at 29 years old, which is pretty common.

They took their sweet time and had their fun before wedding and royal life and work, it was the right thing to do when we see the Harkle's disaster.

[quote] I'm sure some suitable European princesses were paraded before him.

You're sure based on what? This is all supposition.

William bonded with Kate at the University of St. Andrew's. He tried being apart from her mostly because he wanted to see if he was missing out by not dating anyone else, but he missed her too much when they separated and soon got back together with her.

No one wanted Charles to marry Caroline other than Princess Grace. It was pretty well understood by the 1960s and 70s that none of the Queen's children including Charles would likely marry another royal. The era of heirs to the throne needing to marry royalty was a phenomenon of previous centuries: it was only because the Earl Mountbatten kept pushing his handsome nephew on Princess Elizabeth when she was far too young to think about marriage that she ultimately wed a minor royal (and even then only one from a deposed royal family).

The most prolific anti Meghan troll who claimed to be a proud black woman on Lipstick Alley and goes under the name Fancygyal has just been outed as being an Italian blogger. White. This troll was stalking black women on the site and was allowed too.

Looks like she was trying for a photo op. Finds the camera right away. Birds of a feather...

Meghan fancies herself as an expert in animation. If the writing is anything like her calligraphy and the Bench, aren't we in for a treat?

R52 the DL is a site for gay men. Why would we give a shit? Go back to Lipstick Alley. You're all a bunch of homophobes. This is not your forum. Fuck off.

Britney Spears is a big fat fucking racist for choosing today to go to court! She's ruining my big announcement!

Why does she do a show with David Furnish?

I know if I had to be executive producer I would choose a real professionnal to be associated with, someone who knows what he is doing.

I love animes but 90% are unwatchable.

The Monagasque royals are Catholic. That stuff about Caroline and Charles was bullshit, ditto Charlotte and William. Those cafe society scandal ridden Mediterranean Catholics? Please.

The Danish royals tend to marry non-Danes. The rest are a mixed bag of foreign and same citizen spouses.

Kate was the perfect English choice for William. He waited as long as he did because he didn't want to make the mistake his brutally mismatched parents made. And, because he could. He tested Kate to the max, sowed a nice patch of wild oats, and she's turned up aces in fair weather and foul.

William loved his mother but never suffered from Harry's illusory, unquestioning adoration of Diana.

He wanted something else, and in Kate, he found it.

After being raised in his parent's farce of a marriage, only a fool wouldn't have waited, tested, and waited some more.

Shame his brother didn't do the same.

William chose the opposite of Diana, Harry rushed out to marry someone who shared his mother's worst traits.

You can see how those two choices ended up.

I think they just wanted to be able to get drunk at bars as long as possible before marrying.

Once married no way the "Duke and Duchess of Cambridge" could get trashed at the local pub like Wills and Kate could.

For heaven's sake, Camb-shipper, William was besotted with Isabella Calthorpe, asked her to marry him, and he slunk back to Kate after she turned him down flat.

Does this video apply to H and M?

I was browsing the Tyler Perry trending topic on Twitter earlier this morning and saw a thread about someone making up a story about Meghan pushing Tyler's staff into the pool and being kicked out of Tyler's house because of it. Best I can tell, the Fancygyal r52 mentions is the one who made it up on a low-rent gossip blog of hers. She also very much sounds like at least one of the trolls we have here on DL.

I'm not a fan of the Meghan Markle hater trolls over here but I appreciate the info from r52, after seeing the utter crazy on Twitter about this obvious fantasy story.

R61 - It never fails to amaze me how we men, after virtually running most of the planet for most of recorded human history, can't stop bitching about women.

Given the long history of women being deprived of enfranchisement, owning property, of routine sexual enslavement, screwed over in divorce laws, suspected of witchcraft and burnt at the stake for it, not running governments, footbidning, genital mutilation, concubinange, mass rape, etc., and here we are complaining about how women manipulate men.

I put it to you that as with any other oppressed group, there were few weapons to hand: manipulation of men, mostly sexually, was one of those.

We are the last group in the world to be complaining.

I don't think she's a cunt.

We've already established in the good ol' Dangling Tendrils thread that she's an asshole.

R63 The woman in the video talks about what happens today and not the past. Is your only counter-argument how women were treated in the past or do you have something else too? Also, a lot of the things you listed affected men too. Women in the US were able to own property in the past and this gave them the right to vote before the 19th amendment. A quarter of people executed for witchcraft were men. Divorce laws are biased against men nowadays and genital cutting of men and boys against their will is legal around the world. Please criticize the contents of the video next time instead of spreading outdated myths based on sexist stereotypes of abuse. And even if everything you listed solely affected women in the past, does that mean we should be silent about male issues?

If Princess Caroline had a real chance of marrying Prince Charles, Princess Grace would have converted the whole Monaco Royal Family to Anglicanism. The Monegasques like the French (which they are) are not religious at all.

R66 Every formal ceremony of the family is Catholic. Most of the senior royals in Britain don't go to church regularly and the CoE is tottering in Britain.

Bit it still matters. That aside, Caroline wasn't remotely Charles' type. It would never have happened.

R65 If you switched out your argument to race, it wouldn't hold water.

Meanwhile, the world is still far more mens' oyster than women's, even in the First World, never mind the Third World. Just ask the woman being raped by militias in the Congo and now in Ethiopa.

Men have been projecting evil powers of control and manipulation for as long as we have been oppressing them.

Threads about how men manipulate women?

R67 in France people go to church for weddings and funerals. France is a secular society. I know. I lived there for 40 years.

The fact that Caroline wasn't Charles' type didn't matter to Princess Grace. She tried her best.

R68 You still have no real counter-argument and I have no idea why you would mention race. Are you one of those dumb white people who supports things like black lives matter in order to appear virtuous? Because this is what you sound like. And regarding you mentioning the third world. Both men and women need help and freedom there. It's not just women being held down in those countries.

I just saw a segment on MSNBC about how unfair the Olympics are to nursing mothers or something. Unbelievable.

Special interest groups rule the agenda on everything now. The men going to the olympics should be complaining about sperm retention headaches.

the world now belongs to those who whine the loudest which is why Meghan and Harry are celebs: they take Olympic gold for whining

R70 Perhaps you should look up my posts on other topics before mentioning "dumb white people who support BLM". I imagine that got a huge laugh from other posters that recognize my tone on that score.

Aside from your revolting rudeness, you should look things up before making assumptions.

As for the Third World- taking the position that because it's a shitty place overall, women and men are in equally dire straits there is one of the most breathtaking bits of whataboutery I have ever read on DL.

Somalia is listed as the worst place on the planet to be born female.

Tell you what, mate: you die tonight and I'll give you a choice of being reincarnated the next day in Somalia as a man or a woman. Or maybe rural India. Or Afghanistan as the Taliban start running the place again.

Christ, the mass rapes, the kitchen deaths, the fucking life under a burka, FGM, the blocked access to education, and female infanticide because of the huge preference for sons...

Right. And you're blocked, you pompous misogynist fuck.

R74 Men and women should be helped equally, I will stand by that. The focus by first world nations on only women in third world countries is a problem. Boys are falling behind academically and with legal rights in first world countries because all we did was solely lift up women in the last few decades. If third world countries do the same mistake they will end up with the same feminist mess we have here.

All you do is list horrible things randomly third world women are affected by. As if you have memorized them without actually caring about these women. It looks more like as if you are using third world women's plight as a shield because you are out of arguments. Because you still haven't respondend to the contents of the first video I linked. Another example: female infantice in China is a thing because men have responsibility to take care of their parents when they are old. In China elderly couples sued their sons for not taking care of them. Women don't have that obligation. If you have then a one child policy it is not surprising that they would abort female babies with these rules. Freeing men of this specific obligation could have prevented the abortion of female babies but since many people seem to think that helping men is "whataboutery" nothing changed. If you would have watched the video I linked before, your reply towards me wouldn't have been so ignorant.

Your ignorance doesn't surprise me though because you had to proclaim you blocked me. But being afraid to learn something new is nothing to be proud of. Also, if someone is pompous it is you. "Recognizing you by your tone"... You really think you are something in this sewer?

Back to the matter at hand. Why is Meghan Markle such a cunt?

Well, partly because her half-witted doting fawning father raised her to be one.

Meghan's father spoiled her rotten and voila the thanks he gets.

It's just comical how that fug untalented cunt thinks she's so beautiful and special. It's like she has no idea how unattractive she is to people in literally everything.

Does she still have 40.friends left to ask to join her in this fake initiative?

[quoute]The Duchess has asked "40 friends, activists, athletes, artists, and world leaders" to pariticpate in 40 minutes of mentorship or community service to help women re-enter the workplace.

MM virtue signalling on her b'day whereas Obama and his guests will just be having a ball on his estate in Martha's Vineyard on his.

Meghan Markle is the poster illustration of how much more useful in life are attitude, luck, and determination, than actual beauty, talent, and likability.

She has none of the latter but is loaded with the former.

The thing is, just about everyone she comes into contact with, as well as huge swaths of people who have never met her understand this about her instantly.

Her husband understood it immediately. It is for, not despite those qualities, that he married her.

Meghan was the prism through which the public came to see the real Harry: not the cheeky, cheery, laddish soldier boy with the game fun loving blonde on his arm, but a stunted man filled with rage, resentment, obsessed with his dead mother, and callous about the pain he inflicted on a family that loved him, protected him from himself as far as it could, and then reeled in shock as his hate was uncovered.

I suspect her "friends" are C and D list Sunshine Sucks clients.

R82 somebody put up on twitter an old video clip of Prince William juggling tennis balls. He was surprisingly good at it. This explains why Harry was juggling balls like a nitwit in his wife's video. He is totally motivated by jealousy of his brother.

Meghan is not even a cunt anymore, she's just basic and boring now.

If only she was a great Vilain, but she's not.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pa3TmqOorZ6csm%2BvzqZmraCimq6le5FxcGlwaW2FbsPHsmSiq12isqi0wKdkppmioLmmedKumqFlkWKwtrrTZg%3D%3D